[71534] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Akamai DNS Issue?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Levine)
Thu Jun 17 11:38:47 2004
In-Reply-To: <04443E28-C073-11D8-85A5-000A9578BB58@ianai.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2004 10:37:45 -0500
To: Patrick W Gilmore <patrick@ianai.net>
From: Matt Levine <matt-keyword-nanog.aedae7@deliver3.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Ya...didn't look at the setup before I posted, oh well..
I'll still pose the question as a theoretical one... say it was
ultradns rather than akadns (..or any substantially large website in
traffic having an authoritive DNS attack), would verisign be willing to
push changes for somebody 'big' ? should they?
Matt
On Jun 17, 2004, at 10:28 AM, Patrick W Gilmore wrote:
>
> On Jun 17, 2004, at 11:22 AM, Matt Levine wrote:
>>
>> So, were google/yahoo able to get verisign to push a change to the
>> gtld registry to update their NS's, or was it just done during a
>> scheduled update?
>
> What makes you think an update at the GTLDs was required?
>
> Try digging for google.com, then dig for www.google.com. See which
> points at whom.
>
> --
> TTFN,
> patrick
>
