[71246] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [OnTopic] common list sense (Re: Even you can be hacked)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Jakma)
Fri Jun 11 13:33:10 2004
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:20:11 +0100 (IST)
From: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
To: "Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr." <LarrySheldon@cox.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <40C9E754.2060007@cox.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr. wrote:
> Or the document a little out-dated and replaced. But not your
> responsibility huh?
822 might have been superceded, yes, however no newer standards track
RFC has made Reply-to obsolete. My point was that Reply-to isnt
something new, it's something I'd expect anyone on a network ops
mailling list to know about and be able to use.
(if they really wish to run the risk of other people accidently
mailling private correspondence to the Reply-To address).
NB: The other thing you can do is filter your email into seperate
mailboxes, eg each list into a seperate folder. If you do this, the
direct copy will become useful.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
warning: do not ever send email to spam@dishone.st
Fortune:
Innovation is hard to schedule.
-- Dan Fylstra
