[71243] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [OnTopic] common list sense (Re: Even you can be hacked)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Jakma)
Fri Jun 11 13:20:23 2004
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 18:15:16 +0100 (IST)
From: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Cc: "Laurence F. Sheldon, Jr." <LarrySheldon@cox.net>,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <16585.58482.435330.845706@ran.psg.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 11 Jun 2004, Randy Bush wrote:
> reply-to: headers are bad.
Oh, on that I agree.
There are draft RFCs to specify these things better, eg seperating
the concept of 'Reply-to' into one policy for list related replies
and another for personal, mutt supports these drafts already[1], but
there hasnt been much apparent movement in these drafts becoming
standards track. (primarily because there are already similar headers
defined and RFC standards tracked for NNTP readers/posters).
1. which can be annoying when dealing with mutt users.
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
warning: do not ever send email to spam@dishone.st
Fortune:
The soul would have no rainbow had the eyes no tears.
