[70879] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Open Source BGP Route Optimization?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stefan Mink)
Sun May 30 05:21:37 2004
Date: Sun, 30 May 2004 11:21:00 +0200
From: Stefan Mink <mink@schlund.net>
To: Per Gregers Bilse <bilse@networksignature.com>
Cc: Sam Stickland <sam_ml@spacething.org>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200405281337.i4SDbN928478@spirit.qbfox.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:37:23PM +0100, Per Gregers Bilse wrote:
> Another issue is that there isn't much point, as far as regular BGP
> and routing considerations go. Whichever is the best path for a border
> router is the best path; telling other routers about paths it will not
> use serves no (or at best very little) point in this context.
what about persistent route oscillations when you use route reflectors?
You wouldn't have that problem if you could announce several paths...
tschuess
Stefan
--=20
Stefan Mink, Schlund+Partner AG (AS 8560)
Primary key fingerprint: 389E 5DC9 751F A6EB B974 DC3F 7A1B CF62 F0D4 D2BA
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAuad8ehvPYvDU0roRAk6DAKDcamoE6/1itggrKLa+gxff0GCfcwCdE3ow
yxU5DZNWD9Mw1/VZWVJyyLk=
=FT8o
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Kj7319i9nmIyA2yE--
