[708] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Legislative Relief - was Re: Motion for a new POST NSF
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Robert Raisch, The Internet Compan)
Mon Oct 16 14:48:25 1995
From: "Robert Raisch, The Internet Company" <raisch@internet.com>
To: raisch@internet.com (Robert Raisch, The Internet Company),
Paul Ferguson <pferguso@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 1995 14:31:15 -0400
Reply-to: raisch@internet.com
CC: jcurran@bbnplanet.com, gherbert@crl.com, com-priv@lists.psi.com,
nanog@merit.edu
Paul, none of the suggestions I have seen so far (in more than
five years) offer something which 1. is an effective solution,
2. is technologically possible, and 3. places the burden of blame
on the perpetrator.
If you can propose a solution which does not imply:
...imaginary technology to intuit a commercial message from
its content (can anyone say "content based routing"? ;)
...making the management of the affected resources more
rigorous than current practice
...punishing the ISP for the actions of its customers
...complex or impossible deployment issues
...added administrative cost
I and many others would LOVE to hear about it.
I am the first to agree with Shakespere on the value of certain
members of the legal profession.
This time, however, I do not see any recourse. Do you?
</rr>
On 16 Oct 95 at 9:40, Paul Ferguson wrote:
> Eek. Do you _really_ want to get a bunch of shyster lawyers involved?
> I would think that there must be any number of more platable courses of
> action than this...
>
> My $.02.
>
--
The Internet Company - info@internet.com
We Bring Only Value to the Global Internet
