[7035] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Cisco withdrawal email propogation (was Re: withdrawal
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (dave o'leary)
Wed Jan 15 17:23:26 1997
In-Reply-To: <199701151931.TAA10904@diamond.xara.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 1997 13:00:09 -0800
To: "Alex.Bligh" <amb@xara.net>
From: "dave o'leary" <doleary@cisco.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
If people insist on continuing to discuss this (not that I encourage it :-),
cisco-nsp@cic.net might be more appropriate (yeah, I know Bill, it's
critical to the ongoing operations of the Internet and therefore
deserves discussion on the nanog list and the public has a right to know
blah blah).
dave
At 11:31 -0800 1/15/97, Alex.Bligh wrote:
>Matt Ranney <mjr@wacky.eit.com> quoted E.E.Times
>> "So, the REAL problem isn't so much with Cisco routers, but with
>> Cisco's router users."
>
>... I've discovered this odd problem with Cisco router users
>who propogate unwanted emails about BGP withdrawals. Whilst
>they claim there is no harm in doing so, and its not against
>any group charters, spewing this random information out is
>real *annoying*. Any chance someone could fix these users
>so they don't keep spewing out this crap so I can keep my
>NANOG logs clean please. :-)
>
>Alex Bligh
>Xara Networks
