[70231] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [NANOG-LIST] What percentage of the Internet Traffic is junk?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Daniel Golding)
Wed May 5 16:51:29 2004
Date: Wed, 05 May 2004 16:50:51 -0400
From: Daniel Golding <dgolding@burtongroup.com>
To: Brent Van Dussen <vandusb@attens.com>,
"William B. Norton" <wbn@equinix.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20040505114123.02fac0b0@staff.attens.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On 5/5/04 2:41 PM, "Brent Van Dussen" <vandusb@attens.com> wrote:
>
> One mans junk is another mans treasure :)
>
> -Brent
>
>
> At 11:21 AM 5/5/2004, William B. Norton wrote:
>
>> With all the spam, infected e-mails, DOS attacks, ultimately blackholed
>> traffic, etc. I wonder if there has been a study that quantifies
>>
>> What percentage of the Internet traffic is junk?
>>
>> Bill
>
>
>
Once we can determine what percentage of nanog-l traffic is junk, we can
start to tackle the bigger question :)
--
Daniel Golding
Network and Telecommunications Strategies
Burton Group
