[7022] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: withdrawal propagation (was E.E. Times?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Matt Ranney)
Wed Jan 15 14:23:48 1997
From: Matt Ranney <mjr@wacky.eit.com>
To: paul@vix.com (Paul A Vixie)
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 11:13:06 -0800 (PST)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <199701151844.KAA12559@wisdom.home.vix.com> from "Paul A Vixie" at Jan 15, 97 10:44:25 am
Paul A Vixie writes...
>
[...]
> Extra withdrawals was something somebody noticed because they were looking
> for something else. It was amusing, not alarming. Cisco fixed it because
> people (like me) thought it was sloppy and just would not shut up about it.
>
> Tempest. Teapot. Have none of you got anything more important to discuss?
Did anybody else listen to that CNet Radio bit from the EE Times
article's author? At the end of it, the host said something like,
"So, the REAL problem isn't so much with Cisco routers, but with
Cisco's router users."
--
Matt Ranney - mjr@ranney.com
This is how I sign all my messages.
