[70023] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Cisco Router best for full BGP on a sub 5K bidget 7500 7200 or
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Rubenstein)
Sun Apr 25 19:58:54 2004
Date: Sun, 25 Apr 2004 19:57:25 -0400 (Eastern Standard Time)
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
To: Alexander Hagen <alexander@etheric.net>
Cc: "'Robert E. Seastrom'" <rs@seastrom.com>,
"'Tom (UnitedLayer)'" <tom@unitedlayer.com>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <003801c42ab2$dfda7dc0$aa390618@geronimo>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
The MSFC1 is a useless thing, and it is (more or less) impossible to get a
full BGP route view.
S1A-MSFC2 is minimum.
On Sun, 25 Apr 2004, Alexander Hagen wrote:
>
> I bought a Riverstone Rs-3000 for BGP with a single upstream provider.
> Great Deal.
>
> Now I am back to the Cisco Question.
>
> I have two options within my budget:
>
> 1) Catalyst 6006 w/ CATALYST 6000 SUPERVISOR ENGINE 1-A, 2GE, PLUS MSFC
> & PFC
> 2) CATALYST WS-X6248-RJ45, 48-PORT 10/100 FAST ETHERNET SWITCHING MODULE
> 3) DRAM UPGRADE to 256 on Supe Card.
