[69979] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher L. Morrow)
Thu Apr 22 22:20:13 2004
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 02:18:02 +0000 (GMT)
From: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>
To: Daniel Senie <dts@senie.com>
Cc: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>, NANOG <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.2.20040422220653.04a9d0d0@127.0.0.1>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Daniel Senie wrote:
>
> At 05:56 PM 4/22/2004, Dan Hollis wrote:
>
> >Is there any way to move BGP completely out-of-band?
> >
> >I know multihop may be out of the question but maybe someone should write
> >up a proposal for PTP links. :-)
>
> BGP over PPP? Could be specified, but that'd require replacing the use of
> TCP. Might be a bit ugly to implement, especially on larger routers with
> separate control planes.
wasn't there a PPP over SMTP spec? that sounds like a plan for this!
