[69957] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: IP economics morphed into (TCP/RST)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Stephen J. Wilcox)
Thu Apr 22 11:27:48 2004
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:07:38 +0100 (BST)
From: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@telecomplete.co.uk>
To: Niels Bakker <niels=nanog@bakker.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20040422144201.GB1602@snowcrash.tpb.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Thu, 22 Apr 2004, Niels Bakker wrote:
> * steve@telecomplete.co.uk (Stephen J. Wilcox) [Thu 22 Apr 2004, 16:11 CEST]:
> > There isnt a "link-local" for IP altho this would be a great solution
> > (surely this can be written for BGP??).
>
> 169.254/16
is not link-local and will be routed if you try. i was thinking link-local as in
ISIS style
> > Or I could use all eBGP addresses from a block which I dont route and filter
> > internally.. I suspect this is a non-starter, I will have to include all my
> > addresses given to me by peers and its gonna screw traces, monitoring etc.
>
> I've seen e.g. BT do this
and public peering? or when viewed from their peers networks..?
Steve
>
>
> -- Niels.
>
