[69866] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Xspedius / E.Spire as wellRe: Winstar says there is no TCP/BGP vulnerability
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (babylon@egenius.org)
Wed Apr 21 01:53:46 2004
From: babylon@egenius.org
To: nanog@merit.edu
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 00:53:26 -0400 (EDT)
In-Reply-To: <20040420214829.GS30977@overlord.e-gerbil.net> from "Richard A Steenbergen" at Apr 20, 2004 05:48:29 PM
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Hmm... Well as Randy pointed out... I did not have the correct tools when
I configured this on all of Sprintlink in 1996, and I completed it in one
nights maintenance window. All it takes is normal planning. It is not a
pain in the ass... all of the problems you may have faced were corrected
my Mr. Heffernan at Cisco when I ran into them first in 1996. I would
say the rest is laziness.... or the belief it was unnecessary.
jon
> right. All the whining about how we all should have deployed MD5 years ago
> proves one very important point, it hasn't been deployed widely because it
> is a ROYAL PAIN IN THE !@#$%^&*. I haven't actually run the tests myself,
>
