[69679] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: why use IPv6, was: Lazy network operators
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Jakma)
Sun Apr 18 17:26:17 2004
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 22:25:17 +0100 (IST)
From: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
To: Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>
Cc: "Patrick W.Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <BC91A547-915A-11D8-AA90-000A95CD987A@muada.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Sun, 18 Apr 2004, Iljitsch van Beijnum wrote:
> Sure. But I do find myself saying "if we were doing IPv6 right now
> we wouldn't have this problem" more and more.
Which problem is that? ;)
(and if it involves NAT... sorry, no.)
> See http://countipv6.bgpexpert.com/. The different numbers under
> "site" represent different web pages. 8 is a fairly standard one,
> and it gets around 0.15% visits from people who are v6-capable.
And are these sites in any way related to IPv6 or networking? (news
at 11, Web sites about IPv6 get less than 1% v6 traffic ;) )
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
warning: do not ever send email to spam@dishone.st
Fortune:
If your happiness depends on what somebody else does, I guess you do
have a problem.
-- Richard Bach, "Illusions"
