[69660] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Lazy network operators
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Bligh)
Sun Apr 18 08:17:04 2004
Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 13:15:52 +0100
From: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Reply-To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
To: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>,
Michel Py <michel@arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Cc: Paul Vixie <paul@vix.com>, nanog@merit.edu,
Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404180341580.22749@fogarty.jakma.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--On 18 April 2004 03:48 +0100 Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie> wrote:
> Well, let's be honest, name one good reason why you'd want IPv6
> (given you have 4)?
As an IPv6 skeptic I would note that some protocols NAT extremely badly
(SIP for instance), and the bodges to fix it are costly. So if IPv6 means I
can avoid NAT, that can actually save $$$.
Alex
