[69640] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Monitoring dark address space?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Hank Nussbacher)
Sat Apr 17 14:32:33 2004

Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2004 21:30:58 +0200
To: "David A.Ulevitch" <davidu@everydns.net>, nanog@merit.edu
From: Hank Nussbacher <hank@mail.iucc.ac.il>
In-Reply-To: <4165C867-8FAF-11D8-8D42-000393DC735E@everydns.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


At 09:06 AM 16-04-04 -0500, David A.Ulevitch wrote:

>NANOG,
>
>I was wondering how many of you are running some sort of detection tool on 
>"dark address" space on your network?  In an effort to curb malicious 
>outbound non-spoofed traffic from "owned" client machines I think one of 
>the easiest methods we have is to look for scans in what should be dead 
>space.  The source-address spoofed traffic is easy to drop, the "legal" 
>traffic is a bit more complex and I'm looking for non-inline methods of 
>curbing this traffic.
>
>My questions are:
>
>1) Are you doing this and if so, what tools are you using?  Some sort of 
>simple listening device with thresholds would probably do the trick if one 
>machine monitored an entire /24 or some random /32's out of a /16.

We run one on a /16.  You can find details here:
http://noc.ilan.net.il/research/riverhead/
We also know of the SWITCH dark address monitor at:
http://www.switch.ch/security/services/IBN/
I'd be interested in knowing of any others.

The stats haven't been updated in a while but that will change over the 
next few months.

-Hank


>2) What techniques seem to be better? Monitoring an entire /24 or picking 
>a distributed selection of IPs from a /16? (using a /24 or /25 is much 
>easier on the administrative end of things from where I sit...)
>
>3) What sort of threshold metrics for considering something to be 
>malicious have you found to be good?  (ports/second, ip/second, etc)
>
>4) Are there downsides to this (aside from false positives, which would 
>hopefully be rare in truly dark address space).
>
>Off-list replies are fine and I'll summarize after a few days.
>
>thanks,
>davidu
>
>----------------------------------------------------
>   David A. Ulevitch - Founder, EveryDNS.Net
>   Washington University in St. Louis
>   http://david.ulevitch.com -- http://everydns.net
>----------------------------------------------------


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post