[69342] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Anti-Spam Router -- opinions?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Apr 6 16:44:34 2004
To: Dan Hollis <goemon@anime.net>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 06 Apr 2004 13:17:53 PDT."
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0404061316211.1653-100000@sasami.anime.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 16:43:56 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1312373932P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 13:17:53 PDT, Dan Hollis said:
> this implies network operators will suddenly find a clue, something which
> will never happen. ever.
Death of the Internet Predicted. Film at 11.
Note that *no* anti-spam solution will work unless the network operators
have enough clue to deploy it, be it rate limiting, extensions to SMTP,
a replacement for SMTP, or what have you.
The only reason network operators don't have clues is because there's been
little to no evolutionary pressure to acquire same. At some point, there *will*
have to be a weeding out....
--==_Exmh_1312373932P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFAcxaMcC3lWbTT17ARAttfAJ9Dd2Xv1q8iYB3eURiRrQeuSeKcYACgtvZc
3RElLybtk3a7E0KgRfe1RNE=
=/ZwC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1312373932P--
