[68763] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: 2001:590::/32 announced by both AS4436 (nLayer) and AS4474 (Global Village, no contact in whois, but seems to be nLayer...)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (bill)
Tue Mar 16 13:03:36 2004
From: bill <bmanning@karoshi.com>
To: jabley@isc.org (Joe Abley)
Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 10:00:58 -0800 (PST)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu (NANOG (E-mail)), bmanning@karoshi.com (bill)
In-Reply-To: <7E37F77A-7773-11D8-ACC4-00039312C852@isc.org> from "Joe Abley" at Mar 16, 2004 12:58:12 PM
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> On 16 Mar 2004, at 12:03, bill wrote:
>
> > there is no problem with a prefix being
> > announced by more than one ASN.
>
> Bill: have you done any measurement exercises to determine whether this
> is, in fact, an issue? Or was your comment above based on the protocol,
> rather than deployed implementations of the protocol?
based on the protocol, not any specific implementation
thereof.
>
>
> Joe
>