[68269] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: layered security for the modern Internet
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Christopher J. Wolff)
Sun Mar 7 14:57:12 2004
From: "Christopher J. Wolff" <chris@bblabs.com>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 12:56:35 -0700
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0403071921190.21473-100000@a.mx.ict1.everquick.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Eddy,
My favorite idiom is; "You're either part of the problem or part of the
solution."
What's your solution?
Regards,
Christopher J. Wolff, VP CIO
Broadband Laboratories, Inc.
http://www.bblabs.com
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of E.B.
Dreger
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2004 12:32 PM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: layered security for the modern Internet
Looking at last week's NANOG posts: SAV... 30% of spam from
h4x0r3d boxen... bagle...
It seems the original definition and ideology of layered security
are outdated. Layered security now means:
* Do nothing at a given layer if the problem can be solved, or
partially solved, at another layer;
* If a problem cannot be completely solved at a given layer, do
nothing at that layer;
* Approach the problem by arguing on NANOG over who has the most
representative analogy.
Eddy
--
EverQuick Internet - http://www.everquick.net/
A division of Brotsman & Dreger, Inc. - http://www.brotsman.com/
Bandwidth, consulting, e-commerce, hosting, and network building
Phone: +1 785 865 5885 Lawrence and [inter]national
Phone: +1 316 794 8922 Wichita
_________________________________________________________________
DO NOT send mail to the following addresses :
blacklist@brics.com -or- alfra@intc.net -or- curbjmp@intc.net
Sending mail to spambait addresses is a great way to get blocked.
