[68226] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: UUNet Offer New Protection Against DDoS
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steve Francis)
Fri Mar 5 18:30:33 2004
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 15:31:24 -0800
From: Steve Francis <steve@expertcity.com>
To: "Christopher L. Morrow" <christopher.morrow@mci.com>
Cc: "Terranson, Alif" <Alif.Terranson@savvis.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.58.0403052255461.15373@rampart.argfrp.us.uu.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Christopher L. Morrow wrote:
>
>
>uRPF in the core seems like a bad plan, what with diverse routes and such.
>Loose-mode might help SOME, but really spoofing is such a low priority
>issue why make it a requirement? Customer triggered blackholing is a nice
>feature though.
>
>
>
Obviously loose-mode.
Spoofing may not be the current weapon of choice, but why not encourage
the best net infrastructure?
