[68015] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged Network Threat)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Fri Feb 27 13:56:09 2004
To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 27 Feb 2004 20:42:32 +0200."
<403F8F98.4010305@he.iki.fi>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:54:11 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_42919054P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 20:42:32 +0200, Petri Helenius said:
> Unless you are the rare beast with Mobile IP this would probably work =
> alright in 99% of the cases.
20 years ago, 911 was able to say "unless you're the rare beast with a ce=
ll
phone, basing it on the physical service address that the copper runs to =
would
probably work alright in 99% of the cases".
Let's not make the same mistake again.
--==_Exmh_42919054P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFAP5JTcC3lWbTT17ARAr4iAKDBVXNjuQWcZdVII/KJduDkPfFRxgCg2lo7
zBTYxuKkmNFZYEBmvuDWJbE=
=LWAR
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_42919054P--
