[68008] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: How relable does the Internet need to be? (Was: Re: Converged
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul Jakma)
Fri Feb 27 09:55:50 2004
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 14:52:16 +0000 (GMT)
From: Paul Jakma <paul@clubi.ie>
To: Alex Bligh <alex@alex.org.uk>
Cc: Michael.Dillon@radianz.com, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <1288077747.1077890838@[192.168.100.25]>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Alex Bligh wrote:
> Because you always want to get to an E911 service in the same AS
> number...
You do or you dont? I dont see why anycast addresses need or need not
be restricted to same AS.
> (seriously, read the sip & sipping w/gs)
Havnt got the time. :) Unless you have a URL or somesuch as to put me
straight as to why anycast addresses would not be suitable.
However, I'll wager that at some point a URI is translated to an IP
address, be it by client or gateway. And at that point, the mapping
can be to an anycast address.
> Alex
regards,
--
Paul Jakma paul@clubi.ie paul@jakma.org Key ID: 64A2FF6A
warning: do not ever send email to spam@dishone.st
Fortune:
Got Mole problems? Call Avogadro at 6.02 x 10^23.
