[67650] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Anti-spam System Idea
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Sun Feb 15 23:36:31 2004
To: Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org>
Cc: Tim Thorpe <tim@cleanyourdirt.com>,
North American Noise and Off-topic Gripes <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:00:08 CST."
<011001c3f444$26d93b30$6401a8c0@ssprunk>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 23:33:38 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_1256418918P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 22:00:08 CST, Stephen Sprunk said:
> For those interested, the IRTF's ASRG is actively studying anti-spam
> techniques and I'm sure they'd be interested in hearing all of your ideas
> (after you verify they haven't been tried before).
> http://www.irtf.org/charters/asrg.html
Also read: http://www.rhyolite.com/anti-spam/you-might-be.html
It's quite vicious but true - if you have re-invented one of the schemes
mentioned in there, it probably won't be well received unless you include
with it *both* of the the following:
a) An indication that you've read and understood the literature describing why
the idea was shot down the last time it was suggested.
b) A *new* way of dealing with the issue that eliminates the difficulty.
--==_Exmh_1256418918P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFAMEgicC3lWbTT17ARAmPhAKD2j0st8BEKm9kg70rQkdrrzS733gCeJbPw
otPX96CuYG0jg6vhtoa/RIQ=
=E/1m
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_1256418918P--
