[67488] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Root Servers Request
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Tue Feb 10 14:19:22 2004
To: "Stephen J. Wilcox" <steve@telecomplete.co.uk>
Cc: Donovan Hill <lists@lazyeyez.net>, Paul Vixie <vixie@vix.com>,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:03:52 EST."
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0402101401390.23895-100000@server2.tcw.telecomplete.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:18:37 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_-1023318802P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 14:03:52 EST, "Stephen J. Wilcox" said:
> Also, if you spend some time thinking about this you will soon realise that its
> a bad idea for one organisation to control the roots. In fact it works nicely if
> you find 13 different organisations.
I'll overlook the additional fact that the actual root nameservers are
being run in a way that anybody who believes in RFC2826 is, in general,
fairly happy with (modulo the occasional RFC2870 issue).
Most of the complaints seem centered around the management of the
servers [a-m].gtld-servers.net, which is a totally different beast.
--==_Exmh_-1023318802P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFAKS6NcC3lWbTT17ARAv5BAKDMekyo6jCXIPTjRjIkXzNhxeWpVwCghwcy
jmGh/MuXfW1TIYfanlHxq44=
=otx0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-1023318802P--
