[67268] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: greylisting

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Fri Feb 6 22:20:00 2004

Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2004 08:49:12 +0530
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh@outblaze.com>
To: Ken Leland <kwl@shell.monmouth.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <20040206204113.GA21685@shell.monmouth.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


Ken Leland  [2/7/2004 2:11 AM] :

> On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 01:40:14PM -0500, Dmitri Krioukov wrote:
> 
>>can someone provide any comments on greylisting?
>>how effective is it, etc?
> 
> 
> we have 20 regex expressions that block mail directly from a 
> reverse dns that "looks" like a consumer broadband connection. 
> Then we have to maintain a whitelist on a case by case basis.


Er, I think you and Dmitri are talking about different things.

 From a mail operations standpoint, I am not a big fan of graylisting, 
because even legitimate senders get 4xx'd for a while, the first time 
they send mail.

When any such strategy means that someone else's mail queues are filled 
with timed out emails waiting for retransmission, it d not be rocket 
science to see why this just doesn't scale too well.

-- 
srs (postmaster|suresh)@outblaze.com // gpg : EDEDEFB9
manager, outblaze.com security and antispam operations

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post