[67161] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Leo Bicknell)
Tue Feb 3 15:50:20 2004
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2004 15:49:48 -0500
From: Leo Bicknell <bicknell@ufp.org>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <401FFC3A.8000909@he.iki.fi>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message written on Tue, Feb 03, 2004 at 09:53:30PM +0200, Petri Heleni=
us wrote:
> Sure, if you control both endpoints. If you don=B4t and receivers have=20
> small (4k,8k or 16k) window
> sizes, your performance will suffer.
>=20
> Maybe we should define if we=B4re talking about record breaking attempts=
=20
> or real operationally
> useful things here.
Google and Akamai are just two examples of companies with hundreds
of thousands of machines where they move large amounts of data
between them and have control of both ends. Many corporations are
now moving off-site backup data over the Internet, in large volumes
between two end points they control.
The Internet is not just web servers feeding dial-up clients.
--=20
Leo Bicknell - bicknell@ufp.org - CCIE 3440
PGP keys at http://www.ufp.org/~bicknell/
Read TMBG List - tmbg-list-request@tmbg.org, www.tmbg.org
--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQFAIAlsNh6mMG5yMTYRAux0AJ9Tu7cwDijp79ikPw+g4wFeNiFaYwCdGp5d
bdx5cfUVy04OGbeEK3WD7kw=
=Ve5l
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--PEIAKu/WMn1b1Hv9--
