[67153] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Strange public traceroutes return private RFC1918 addresses
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Petri Helenius)
Tue Feb 3 13:59:36 2004
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 20:54:55 +0200
From: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
To: bill <bmanning@karoshi.com>
Cc: Terry Baranski <tbaranski@mail.com>, Michael.Dillon@radianz.com,
nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200402031454.i13EsdD10815@karoshi.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
bill wrote:
>>
>
> got me... although I could fabricate a rational.
>
> 40 byte packets @ 40Gig is a wonder to contemplate.
> the whole ATM argument (53byte "cells" over 100Meg)
> being an egregious overhead expense for segmentation/
> reassembly is amplified here.
>
>
There are more cell-based fixed access links running IP than all other
technologies combined.
(fixed == not counting dialup)
So cells must be good for you. At least they sell well :)
Pete
