[67088] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: other virus damages/costs.....(hello skynet.be ?)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Mon Feb 2 09:03:07 2004
To: jlewis@lewis.org
Cc: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 02 Feb 2004 08:42:53 EST."
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0402020838160.1212-100000@redhat1.mmaero.com>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 2004 09:02:01 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_-599318981P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 08:42:53 EST, jlewis@lewis.org said:
> But this really doesn't seem to be NANOG material. Try spam-l or
> spamtools.
When the traffic blip caused by the A/V tools is bigger than the
traffic blip caused by the actual virus, it's an operational issue.
--==_Exmh_-599318981P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQFAHlhZcC3lWbTT17ARAiF1AKDzhaX1hxwQXcWHQLmeTqFzFEXE7ACfYE2y
Gsj/3eXYsdPOIfu0IZjhB5k=
=LflA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_-599318981P--
