[6687] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Non-profit IP Registry

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David R. Conrad)
Fri Jan 3 01:18:02 1997

To: David Stoddard <dgs@us.net>
cc: nanog@merit.edu, davidc@apnic.net
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 03 Jan 1997 00:09:30 EST."
             <199701030509.AAA18840@us.net> 
Date: Fri, 03 Jan 1997 15:09:15 +0900
From: "David R. Conrad" <davidc@apnic.net>

David,

ISPs in Asia, the Pacific Rim, Europe, the Middle East, and Northern
Africa pay similar fees for allocation services from APNIC or RIPE-NCC
and most of these regions are growing faster than the US.  Further,
small businesses should *NOT* be obtaining addresses from a regional
registry directly -- they should be obtaining them from their provider.

Regards,
-drc
---------
>
>	While I admit it is not completely clear reading the proposal
>	outlined on the web page at http://rs.internic.net/arin, charging
>	$2,500 for a /24 will *kill* the small business market, and the
>	ISPs that exist to service that market.  Most of the associations
>	and small businesses we deal with choke when thay have to pay $750
>	for a router to handle their dedicated Internet connection.  Added
>	to the fact that the LECs want to charge per minute charges for 
>	POTS lines used for dedicated dial-up, a $2,500 IP address charge
>	will guarantee that the small business portion of the market will
>	disappear.  We all depend on the net for a living folks -- I don't
>	think we should consider any proposal that would have a negative
>	effect on our own industry.
>
>	Dave Stoddard
>	US Net Incorporated
>	301-572-5926
>	dgs@us.net
>
>

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post