[66761] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: What's the best way to wiretap a network?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Kurt Erik Lindqvist)
Fri Jan 23 01:06:29 2004
In-Reply-To: <7ZrR$6VD1nDAFAFa@perry.co.uk>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
From: Kurt Erik Lindqvist <kurtis@kurtis.pp.se>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 07:04:17 +0100
To: Roland Perry <nanog@internetpolicyagency.com>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
(Although I now what the NA...stands for I have to ask)
>> From the initial discussions in Sweden around the new electronic
>> communications act, it seems as if the operators are obliged to
>> provide
>> tapping free of charge. If this turns out to be the case, I guess it
>> is
>> pretty much the same all over Europe as the law is supposed to be
>> based
>> on a EU framework.
>
> There's nothing in the new EU Communications Framework (or indeed
> elsewhere in EU law) that controls whether or not operators can charge
> for wiretaps. It's a country by country thing. Complicated by some
> countries that claim to re-imburse, actually being chronically bad at
> paying the invoices.
So the EU part is only the tapping requirement? The charging scheme is
local? Or did I miss all of this?
- kurtis -
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 8.0.3
iQA/AwUBQBC5ZKarNKXTPFCVEQIXMgCgx9GfYC+KS43lvfqUAW94bwRGH8sAoLk7
Pss7/MQctcapaNOWAL0Au6V1
=Ei2W
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
