|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 22:54:13 +0100 (CET) From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> To: NANOG <nanog@merit.edu> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.21.0401211409520.12691-100000@meron.openu.ac.il> Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu On Wed, 21 Jan 2004, Rafi Sadowsky wrote: > As for the 3550-EMI "real life" experience as a 10/100 BT aggregation switch > wasn't affected(CPU <5%) at all by rather aggressive scanning but did > generate around 11 Mb/sec of ARP requests on all the 100Mb/sec ports in the same > VLAN and totally killed connectivity to legacy equipment connected at 10 Mb/s ... In my experience, a few megs of broadcast that a 7206VXR handled fairly well totally killed off a 3550. -- Mikael Abrahamsson email: swmike@swm.pp.se
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |