[66530] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: PC Routers (was Re: /24s run amuck)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Scott McGrath)
Thu Jan 15 08:33:32 2004
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 08:32:50 -0500 (EST)
From: Scott McGrath <mcgrath@fas.harvard.edu>
To: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <DD7FE473A8C3C245ADA2A2FE1709D90B06C864@server2003.arneill-py.sacramento.ca.us>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
You buy a OSM from Cisco and you can queue and do QoS based upon bgp index
or AS
Scott C. McGrath
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Michel Py wrote:
>
> > Deepak Jain wrote:
> > With a network boot OS for each POP, you can do
> > version control much much more easily.
>
> This is seriously flawed, IMHO. I'd encourage my competitors to do it:
> after the master image gets corrupted all it takes is a bozo tripping
> the right circuit breaker and the entire POP is kaput.
>
> > QOS, priority/custom queueing are all KERNEL/underlying
> > OS functions.
>
> This also is flawed, IMHO. What if you want to do queing or QOS based on
> BGP?
>
> Michel.
>
