[66472] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: /24s run amuck
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Steven M. Bellovin)
Wed Jan 14 11:51:43 2004
From: "Steven M. Bellovin" <smb@research.att.com>
To: Michael.Dillon@radianz.com
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 14 Jan 2004 10:39:33 GMT."
<OF933FD648.FA437A02-ON80256E1B.003A114A-80256E1B.003A552C@radianz.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:51:13 -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
In message <OF933FD648.FA437A02-ON80256E1B.003A114A-80256E1B.003A552C@radianz.c
om>, Michael.Dillon@radianz.com writes:
>
>>> The thing that surprises me is that there aren't any small
>>> vendors offering fairly generic routing boxes, i.e. Intel-based
>
>>imagestream does this, afaik. not too familiar with their offerings
>though.
>
>I stand corrected. The following page comparing Cisco and Imagestream
>is quite interesting.
>
>http://www.imagestream.com/Cisco_Comparison.html
>
Hmm -- does anyone here have one? How good a job did they do locking
down Linux?
--Steve Bellovin, http://www.research.att.com/~smb
