[66449] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: /24s run amuck
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Palmer)
Tue Jan 13 16:26:18 2004
From: "John Palmer" <nanog@adns.net>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 15:20:33 -0600
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
And then there are the upstreams that filter legacy /24's
Seen that too...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Patrick W.Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Cc: "Patrick Gilmore" <patrick@ianai.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 15:13
Subject: Re: /24s run amuck
>
> On Jan 13, 2004, at 4:04 PM, Vadim Antonov wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 13 Jan 2004, Michael Hallgren wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Jan 13, 2004, at 6:33 AM, Michael Hallgren wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Unfortunately, I've seen Peering Policies which require
> >>> things like "Must announce a minimum of 5,000 prefixes". :(
> >>
> >>
> >> Wonderful...
> >>
> >> mh
> >
> > Easy to fix by changing to "covering N million IP addresses" - but,
> > then,
> > that becomes an address space conservation issue.
>
> Yeah, that makes sense 'cause the utility of my network is directly
> related to the number of IPs in it.
>
> Er, um, uh.... Maybe not.
>
> --
> TTFN,
> patrick
>
>
>
