[66370] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my!
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Wojtek Zlobicki)
Thu Jan 8 12:16:49 2004
From: "Wojtek Zlobicki" <wojtekz@idirect.com>
To: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:15:51 -0500
In-Reply-To: <200401081518.i08FIYT03679@rex.isdn.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Ejay,
Those would be Intel NICs.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On Behalf Of Ejay
Hire
Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 10:17 AM
To: 'Alexei Roudnev'; rhealey@norstar.com; 'Jeff Kell'
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: RE: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my!
"used to be..." One could lay hands on a magic Cd that turned an ordinary
PC with (Commonly available but the Brand Escapes me) Nics into a Juniper
Olive that ran the full JunOS. It has disappeared, much to the
disappointment of those of us that would love to use one to study for a
cert/resume fodder.
-Ejay
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu]
On
> Behalf Of Alexei Roudnev
> Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 12:51 AM
> To: rhealey@norstar.com; Jeff Kell
> Cc: nanog@nanog.org
> Subject: Re: GSR, 7600, Juniper M?, oh my!
>
>
> >
> > Many interesting network solutions that have to be
> dismissed outright
> > because of IOS limitations, weaknesses or bugs can be
> easily expressed
> > in newer systems, not just JUNOS.
>
> Example, please.
>
> (Agree with Jiniper OS for x86 - many people avoid Juniper
> because do not
> know it).
