|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |
To: ras@e-gerbil.net (Richard A Steenbergen) Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 08:27:29 +0000 (GMT) Cc: bcm@inkline.com (bcm), nanog@merit.edu In-Reply-To: <20040106223612.GD97351@overlord.e-gerbil.net> from "Richard A Steenbergen" at Jan 06, 2004 05:36:12 PM From: neil@DOMINO.ORG (Neil J. McRae) Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu > 7500s? In 2004? Throw those things in the trash where they belong. It's > always amazing to me how many people will cling to obsolete things for > years just because it is what they know. Don't agree with this. For E1/T1 access these boxes are fine. Yes they are long in the tooth but they are quite capable. I wouldn't spend a huge amount of time or money trying to make them do anything else though. > Even a Juniper M5 will do 16 OC3's with line rate filtering and > forwarding. There are probably a dozen design considerations based on > requirements you haven't described, but if you're doing primarily sonet, > 7600 isn't really the way to go. Depends on what "primarily sonet" means. Regards, Neil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| home | help | back | first | fref | pref | prev | next | nref | lref | last | post |