[66105] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: Out of office/vacation messages
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Fri Dec 26 09:12:15 2003
Date: Fri, 26 Dec 2003 09:11:24 -0500
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh@outblaze.com>
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: <200312261407.hBQE7PxC014838@ludwigV.sources.org>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Stephane Bortzmeyer writes on 12/26/2003 9:07 AM:
> Why? There is Mail-Followup-To and you can set Reply-To yourself. And you can
> always edit your headers (or have a software which can do it automatically
> like mutt).
Look - just how many mail clients (other than mutt / gnus) honor the
M-F-T header? And I am not trying to rehash the "reply-to the list is
good / bad" thread, I don't really feel all that strongly about it.
What I said is that the method proposed wouldn't cut down on OOOs to the
list.
srs
--
srs (postmaster|suresh)@outblaze.com // gpg : EDEDEFB9
manager, outblaze.com security and antispam operations
