[65971] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: Low end router alternative?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (David Langlands)
Fri Dec 19 17:37:21 2003
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 16:37:40 -0600
From: "David Langlands" <dsl@sportvision.com>
To: "Gerald" <gcoon@inch.com>
Cc: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Technically speaking, the port is definitely not a HSSI port. =20
HSSI is ~ 52mbps and used for DS-3 and E3. You're probably looking for
a v.35 interface, EIA-422/485, or similar interface to match your CSU.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: Gerald [mailto:gcoon@inch.com]=20
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 4:18 PM
To: Ejay Hire
Cc: 'Gerald'; nanog@merit.edu
Subject: RE: Low end router alternative?
On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Ejay Hire wrote:
> Lucent Pipeline 130, Superpipe 95, or Superpipe 155.
Well 2 minutes on Froogle tell me your definition of cheap and mine
don't
match. For the same price range I would get a netopia R4522 or 5300
which
will reliably do NAT and all.
With a little more research, I think I can better clarify that I'm
looking
for just about any router (<$50-100) that has a HSSI port and an RJ45
port. For what I'm looking for at the moment (experimenting)
used/refurbished doesn't matter so long as it works.
Gerald
