[6590] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: NAP/ISP Saturation WAS: Re: Exchanges that matter...
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Li)
Fri Dec 20 23:27:39 1996
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 1996 20:18:56 -0800 (PST)
From: Tony Li <tli@jnx.com>
To: avg@pluris.com (Vadim Antonov)
Cc: nanog@merit.edu
There is a $0.02 fix for the "routing security" problem --
use a logically separate network for exchanging routing and
network monitoring information. That solution will be
100 years old next afternoon.
Routing updates must _not_ be encapsulated in routable datagrams.
That much, people who did GGP got right.
So what's the $0.02 fix for eliminating the fate-sharing between routing
and payload that GGP got wrong?
Tony
