[65678] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ?

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Tony Hain)
Thu Dec 4 19:25:19 2003

From: "Tony Hain" <alh-ietf@tndh.net>
To: "'just me'" <matt@snark.net>, "'Petri Helenius'" <pete@he.iki.fi>
Cc: <nanog@nanog.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 16:26:39 -0800
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.33L0.0312041459580.5957-100000@pants.snark.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


just me wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Dec 2003, Petri Helenius wrote:
> 
>   And I refer you to the blocks which are properly registered down
>   to the /29 level and you are saying that if you are a good citizen
>   collateral damage is recommended regardless because antispammers
>   are either lazy or technically incompetent or like their ego
>   boosted by intentional collateral damage?
> 
>   Pete
> 
> Can you explain to the less hyperbolic among us, why I should be
> obligated to exchange packets with a provider who hosts abusive
> customers.

Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer.

That said, IMHO you are free to do what you want as an individual, but
collusion by a group to block a provider (even one with abusive customers)
smells a lot like restraint of trade. 

Tony



home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post