[65612] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: AOL rejecting mail from IP's w/o reverse DNS ?
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Adam McKenna)
Wed Dec 3 12:44:25 2003
Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 09:27:22 -0800
To: nanog@nanog.org
In-Reply-To: <20031203163810.GD30403@ehlke.net>
From: Adam McKenna <adam@flounder.net>
Mail-Followup-To: nanog@nanog.org
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 08:38:10AM -0800, Pete Ehlke wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 03, 2003 at 11:28:19AM -0500, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> >
> > ps - there's of course the rather umm... interesting content below ;)
> > http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/avoid-rfc-2317-delegation.html
> >
> Which is totally, completely wrong and causes, in both cases, servers to
> leak name space (which causes cache poisoning) and, in once case,
> servers to potentially be marked as lame. The man is flat out wrong.
> Don't follow his advice.
How can delegating in-addr.arpa on a per-ip basis be any different or worse
than delegating it using an rfc2317 scheme?
--Adam
