[65424] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [RE: MPLS billing model]
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Rubenstein)
Tue Nov 25 15:02:51 2003
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 14:59:36 -0500 (Eastern Standard Time)
From: Alex Rubenstein <alex@nac.net>
To: joshua sahala <joshua.ej.smith@usa.net>
Cc: "St. Clair, James" <JStClair@vredenburg.com>,
"'Nanog List (E-mail) '" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <361HkyTWg7136S07.1069789687@uwdvg007.cms.usa.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> we are still in the testing phases, but i believe that we are planning to
> use a port+traffic billing scheme, if/when we go live and start trying to
> sell it
do you mean:
$port + $traffic_through_port
or:
$port + $traffic_over_vpn_tunnel
I ask this, because, it's very possible that the customer facing port
could be a VLAN trunk, and that there would be a hub-and-spoke config to
multiple leaf ports; other variations exist, as well.
-- Alex Rubenstein, AR97, K2AHR, alex@nac.net, latency, Al Reuben --
-- Net Access Corporation, 800-NET-ME-36, http://www.nac.net --
