[65289] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: RBLs in use
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Paul S. Brown)
Thu Nov 20 10:49:35 2003
From: "Paul S. Brown" <pol@geekstuff.co.uk>
To: "todd glassey" <tglassey@Stanford.edu>,
"todd glassey" <todd.glassey@worldnet.att.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 15:51:44 +0000
In-Reply-To: <012901c3af7b$9e734ae0$010aff0a@tsg>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
Nope,
Just an ISP with normal ISP type operational spam problems. I'm trying to
quantify how often we actually appear on RBL, but I want to get some idea of
how much credence to give to appearing on any given list.
For example something like the old Dorkslayers lists should be ignored because
they would blacklist you if you sneezed at the wrong time, however MAPS is
probably a good list.
P.
On Thursday 20 November 2003 3:33 pm, todd glassey wrote:
> Does this mean that your employer is a spam operator?
>
> T
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Paul S. Brown" <pol@geekstuff.co.uk>
> To: <nanog@merit.edu>
> Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 7:16 AM
> Subject: RBLs in use
>
> > I have been asked to find out what DNSBLs are in use so my employer can
>
> see
>
> > what the incidence of its being blacklisted is and how much impact this
> > is likely to have had on their business.
> >
> > What DNSBLs are being used by the various agencies represented on NANOG
>
> and
>
> > how much weighting do you give them. Are there any DNSBLs you would
> > completely ignore due to data quality issues?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Paul
