[65262] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: OT: BGP questions
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Pete Templin)
Wed Nov 19 04:23:07 2003
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 03:22:26 -0600
From: "Pete Templin" <pete.templin@texlink.com>
To: "Charles Sprickman" <spork@inch.com>, <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
It's not a dispute, it's a dollar$ decision on behalf of Sprint and/or =
MFN.
"Hmmm, I'm getting paid by 6939 but not by 3356. I'll send my traffic =
through 6939 by increasing my local preference to them."
Pete Templin
Senior Staff Engineer
TexLink Communications
(210) 892-4183
pete.templin@texlink.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Sprickman [mailto:spork@inch.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 1:24 AM
To: nanog@merit.edu
Subject: Re: OT: BGP questions
> On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Charles Sprickman wrote:
>
> > (just look at AS8059, which is still sucking down most traffic via =
6939
> > rather than 3356, even with all that silly prepending)...
Found an interesting one. Sprint no longer has a "full" looking glass,
just this:
http://oxide.sprintlink.net/cgi-bin/glass.pl
But it shows Sprint reaching 8059 via MFN, even with the prepends. Is
there a Sprint/Level3 peering dispute that I'm not aware of? Might
someone from Sprint comment on this privately?
Thanks,
Charles
