[65005] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

Re: Openwave Opinions

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Suresh Ramasubramanian)
Sat Nov 8 20:08:13 2003

Date: Sat, 08 Nov 2003 20:07:23 -0500
From: Suresh Ramasubramanian <suresh@outblaze.com>
To: "Rubens Kuhl Jr." <rubens@email.com>
Cc: "Fisher, Shawn" <SFisher@Bresnan.com>,
	"Nanog List (E-mail)" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <125901c3a65b$9e37d600$020ba8c0@NOTEBOOK>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


Rubens Kuhl Jr. writes on 11/8/2003 7:51 PM:

>>Sometimes outsourcing corporate / isp mail handling to a provider like
>>us, criticalpath, postini etc might be a good way to go.
> 
> Outsourcing is usually a good way to get a solution with expertise instead
> of a next->next->finish software installation and license to use it... but
> for ISP use, integration with internal OSS (billing, tech-support etc.)
> seems to be a challenge. Outsourcing costs also keeps most ISPs from using
> such a solution, unless time-to-market is the one and only criteria.

Well - there are ways (such as that the outsourcer only handles the MX 
for the domain[s], and then routes all inbound mail to the ISP, who 
handles file storage / pop3 / webmail).  Or an onsite install of the mta 
/ antispam solution etc, updated by the outsourcer (push updates using 
rsync, for example) but sitting on racks in the ISP's data center.

-- 
srs (postmaster|suresh)@outblaze.com // gpg : EDEDEFB9
manager, outblaze.com security and antispam operations

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post