[64995] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: This may be stupid but..
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (John Brown (CV))
Sat Nov 8 17:39:15 2003
Date: Sat, 8 Nov 2003 15:33:52 -0700
From: " John Brown (CV)" <jmbrown@chagresventures.com>
To: "Fisher, Shawn" <SFisher@Bresnan.com>
Cc: "Nanog List (E-mail)" <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <C08C23F7F6D3D2119F3E0008C7B1B91D03DBF74E@WHITEPLAINS>; from SFisher@Bresnan.com on Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 05:16:46PM -0500
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
so negotiate with the recruiter.
benifits of a recuriter are:
* they take the twit calls
* they read thru the resumes and sort the junk out
* they do the screening
* they do the reference and background checks
* they have more resources to find people than you do
this saves you time and money on your end. time better
spent building customer base, solving customer problems, etc.
and if you do a good contract with the recruiter, if the
person you hire is sacked, they find you a new one at no cost :)
On Sat, Nov 08, 2003 at 05:16:46PM -0500, Fisher, Shawn wrote:
>
> If this question is inappropriate for this list I apoligize in advance.
>
> I have several open engineering positions that I am trying to fill without
> the use of a recruiter. My thoughts on using a recruiter is they end up
> extracting a fee from the employer that would be better put to the future
> employee.
>
> My question, what is the most effective way to recruit quality engineers?
> Does anyone have experience or opinions to share?
>
> TIA,
>
> Shawn
