[64731] in North American Network Operators' Group

home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post

RE: more on filtering

daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Alex Yuriev)
Fri Oct 31 13:19:47 2003

Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 09:29:08 -0500 (EST)
From: Alex Yuriev <alex@yuriev.com>
To: Matthew Kaufman <matthew@eeph.com>
Cc: 'Greg Maxwell' <gmaxwell@martin.fl.us>,
	'Chris Parker' <cparker@starnetusa.net>, <nanog@merit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <004901c39fd9$cb90cd10$0200b3cd@matthewdesk>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu


> Do you actually believe that it was a BAD idea for Cisco to build a router
> that is more efficient (to the point of being able to handle high-rate
> interfaces at all) when presented with traffic flows that look like real
> sessions?

Why buy something that works well only sometimes ("we are very efficient
when it looks like 'real' traffic" from Cisco)  when you can buy ("no one
told us that we should have issues with some specific packets") Juniper?

Alex


home help back first fref pref prev next nref lref last post