[64708] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: more on filtering
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (daryl@introspect.net)
Fri Oct 31 10:50:39 2003
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 10:49:04 -0500
From: <daryl@introspect.net>
To: <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nanog@merit.edu [mailto:owner-nanog@merit.edu] On=20
> Behalf Of Chris Parker
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:01 PM
> To: Alex Yuriev
> Cc: nanog@merit.edu
> Subject: Re: more on filtering
>=20
[...]
> I don't see how that is the same thing here. I have an=20
> agreement with cust X to provide services in accordance with=20
> my AUP. cust X resells that service to cust Y, etc. cust Y=20
> is bound to the terms and conditions of my agreement with=20
> cust X, despite that I do not have a direct agreement with cust Y.
Oh christ...network engineers trying to be lawyers.
I don't know much, but I do know that legal agreements in the US are NOT
transitive in this way, unless each agreement is included by reference
in the other.
Daryl
