[64556] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: [arin-announce] IPv4 Address Space (fwd)
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Cliff Albert)
Mon Oct 27 17:40:55 2003
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 23:40:14 +0100
From: Cliff Albert <cliff-nanog@oisec.net>
To: nanog@merit.edu
Cc: Cliff Albert <cliff+nanog@oisec.net>
Reply-To: Cliff Albert <cliff+nanog@oisec.net>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.44.0310271539100.81519-100000@thunder.xecu.net>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 04:10:26PM -0500, Andy Dills wrote:
> Technologies like NAT and efforts to reclaim poorly assigned address space
> have a large negative pressure on the increase of IP utilization. As more
> and more "appliances" need IP addresses, people will realize more and more
> that the last thing they want is those "applicances" on public IP space.
>=20
> Does anybody have statistics for assigned-but-not-announced space? I'd be
> willing to bet there will be more and more dead space over the years, and
> in fact quite a bit of "increasing usage" is just churn.
http://www.potaroo.net/ispcolumn/2003-07-v4-address-lifetime/ale.html =
=20
=
=20
This is actually a pretty good write-up about the IPv4 address lifetime =
=20
by Geoff Huston. It has some graphs that compares BGP to actually =
=20
assigned space comparisons. Makes very good reading about all this. =
=20
--=20
Cliff Albert | RIPE: CA3348-RIPE | https://oisec.net/
cliff@oisec.net | 6BONE: CA2-6BONE |
PGP Fingerprint =3D 9ED4 1372 5053 937E F59D B35F 06A1 CC43 9A9B 1C5A
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/nZ7OBqHMQ5qbHFoRAp88AJ9jjZ0oTBl0pwiSqQtVIjxACAV4ywCfU2JA
bMtL6rUDL6Ie4rJt29zxdNQ=
=Fs5r
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk--
