[64124] in North American Network Operators' Group
Re: more on VeriSign to revive redirect service
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu)
Thu Oct 16 12:32:36 2003
To: Andrew D Kirch <trelane@trelane.net>
Cc: "Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC)" <henk@ripe.net>, nanog@merit.edu
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:16:53 CDT."
<20031016101653.3627085b.trelane@trelane.net>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 11:53:14 -0400
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
--==_Exmh_820462674P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
On Thu, 16 Oct 2003 10:16:53 CDT, Andrew D Kirch <trelane@trelane.net> said:
> I would certainly say there's an elitism, or perhaps a higher level of
> credibility given to a .com or .net site, due to the fact that they've probably
> existed for quite a bit longer than a .biz or .info.
Most of my spam points back to .com addresses. Not much credibility generated
there...
There's sufficient churn on the bottom-feeding .com's that it's not a reliable
indicator. Now you want *stability*, look for a site that's got a .arpa other than
in-addr.arpa :)
--==_Exmh_820462674P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001
iD8DBQE/jr7pcC3lWbTT17ARAs1LAJ4wPCx6/GxF/AeIvPikyruFs+K7VgCeInVo
gvHbK5lOQLHDVjCajcERmq4=
=rJ+w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--==_Exmh_820462674P--
