[64093] in North American Network Operators' Group
RE: more on VeriSign to revive redirect service
daemon@ATHENA.MIT.EDU (McBurnett, Jim)
Thu Oct 16 09:34:31 2003
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2003 09:31:21 -0400
From: "McBurnett, Jim" <jmcburnett@msmgmt.com>
To: "Miles Fidelman" <mfidelman@civicnet.org>,
"nanog list" <nanog@merit.edu>
Errors-To: owner-nanog-outgoing@merit.edu
All,=20
I hate to agree but he is right.
With companies like godaddy out there.=20
Does it make sense to pay Verislime money to fund sitefinder and our =
headaches?
To change this: what else can we do to prevent this? Does the last BIND =
version truly break sitefinder?
Later,
Jim
->-----Original Message-----
->From: Miles Fidelman [mailto:mfidelman@civicnet.org]
->Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 9:24 AM
->To: nanog list
->Subject: Re: more on VeriSign to revive redirect service
->
->
->
->Just out of curiousity, I wonder how many domain=20
->registrations those of us
->on nanog represent? Contract sanctions from ICANN are one=20
->thing, taking
->all of our business elsewhere might also be effective at=20
->getting a point
->across (though it might also backfire - pushing Verisign to=20
->be even more
->agressive at taking advantage of their positioning).
->
->Miles
->
->
